Incorporating Tony's strategic framework + Joana's execution plan. Framed for Ron.
Alliance agreement in progress - once locked, other firms can't replicate the embedded position. But only while Deloitte is the sole enterprise deployment partner.
May 31 Swimlane migration, HP install, Mythos vulnerability wave - first mover with production agents wins. The market won't wait.
Compound learning starts only when agents are live in production. Every week of delay = competitors close the gap.
Kindo Core Platform Team
Swimlane $3-6M/yr · Jira/ITSM $0.5-1.5M · CrowdStrike $2-4M = ~$5.5-11.5M/yr cost elimination
"Sunset Swimlane in every which capacity" - Krishna
Deloitte Rapid Response Team
Deloitte Rapid Response Team
Each agent (A.6-A.11) = new service capability = new billable offering. New revenue at near-zero marginal cost - the highest-margin source
"Every agent is a net new revenue goal - either new revenue dollars or better profit margins" - Krishna
"Speed is going to be the most essential thing for us"
Cost elimination depends on Kindo clean Self-Managed installs and training Deloitte on Kindo. But Scale Efficiency and Net New Revenue depend on custom configurations and mining new agent design/build opportunities.
Fulfill existing license. Cost us to deliver (IK transfer) but no incremental revenue.
| ID | Agent | Status | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| A.1 | Threat Monitoring | PROD | MXDR |
| A.2 | Threat Intel | PROD | MXDR |
| A.3 | Threat Hunt | PROD | MXDR |
| A.4 | Detection Eng | PROD | MXDR |
| A.5 | CTEM | BUILT | MXDR |
Each is a revenue event. Push $5.5M → $6.5-7M+. Justifies CDO role.
| ID | Agent | Status | Model | Ph |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.6 | Vitals Dashboard | PLAN | Cross | 2 |
| A.7 | Quality Audit | PLAN | Cross | 2 |
| A.8 | Cloud Security | PLAN | Ded/Sh | 3 |
| A.9 | IR Agent | PLAN | Ded/Sh | 3 |
| A.10 | IoT/OT | PLAN | Ded/Sh | 3 |
| A.11 | Custom Client | PLAN | Bespoke | 3 |
| A.12 | Identity→IdaaS | PLAN | New SL | 4 |
| A.13 | GRC→GRC aaS | PLAN | New SL | 4 |
Institutional knowledge ≠ static knowledge extraction. Kush's definition = compound learning through use. This is a flywheel, not a one-time transfer.
Individual analyst's agent learns their patterns and preferences over time
"Week 10 vs week 6?" - Kush
Agent improves across all users by processing real-world cases
Accumulated learning across all agents becomes organizational intelligence
"You also got a free design partner. That's how you should look at it." - Kush
"There's a Venn diagram overlapping Mythos and Deloitte" - Tony, May 19
Customer buys Kindo platform + training. Builds their own agents from scratch.
Customer starts from zero. Months to first production agent. Generic platform sale.
Kindo platform + pre-configured agent templates built from Deloitte production experience.
Days to first production agent. Battle-tested, not lab prototypes. Premium pricing.
Same template model extends across Cyber Operate portfolio:
Each bundle = a sellable product per discipline. Deloitte hardening = proof points for every bundle.
Pre-configured templates + integration patterns. Customer still customizes. Comparable to SOAR platform + content packs pricing.
Production-proven at Deloitte. Battle-tested in F50 environment. Comparable to MDR vs self-managed EDR pricing.
Speed premium during active vulnerability wave. "Deployed in days, not months." Comparable to IR surge pricing.
| Scenario | Clients /yr | Bundle Premium | Avg Deal Size | Incremental Rev |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-only baseline | - | - | $500K-$2M | - |
| Conservative Premium (Deloitte service lines) | 3-5 | +50% | $750K-$3M | $1-5M |
| Target Package Premium (Deloitte + Mythos) | 5-10 | +75% | $875K-$3.5M | $2.5-12M |
| Aggressive Premium (Mythos surge) | 10-20 | +100-150%+ | $1-$5M | $5-25M |
UNVERIFIED: Deal sizes are structural estimates based on enterprise cybersecurity SOAR/MDR market comps ($826M→$1.7B SOAR market, MarketsandMarkets). Actual Kindo pricing needs validation from Ron/Kush. Client count scenarios are directional, not forecasted.
Portfolio / Strategy · Deloitte GM
Program / Execution · Governance
Product / Engineering Lead
Chief Architect · Kindo-Dedicated Eng
Delivery Support
Business / Config (60% of scaling)
Think: former SOC analyst / security consultant who learns the Kindo platform
Platform / Integration
Builds the plumbing connecting agents to client systems
Force Multiplier (~2-3 engineers equiv)
7-person commitment: Tony, Joana, Victor, Charlie, Dukane, Agent Designer, Engineer. Warren comes with the package. Phase growth: 3 engineers → 5 + delivery lead → 10 + team.
Move beyond A.1-A.5 contracted scope into A.6-A.13 net new revenue. Revenue trajectory: $5.5M → $1-2M+ net new → $5-12M+ upside (2-3× expansion). Share of net new revenue that T&C creates through the alliance expansion.
Operating partner for the engagement. The only person who can acquire the institutional knowledge that 55% of scope depends on. CDO role = learning loop accelerator for the ~70% of EBITDA improvement that flows through IK.
May 31 Swimlane AI migration → HP deployment → 100 installs by Feb 2027. "Speed of engagement > depth of engagement." The exclusivity window closes when competitors catch up.
Ask: Click-click-click installs (was 3-5 days).
Now: 1st production Self-Managed Kindo install in Deloitte's internal IT environment this week. Installer/upgrader/preflight in May 27 release. Observability MVP in final testing.
What this means: Kindo ships features to its cloud (SaaS) version first. Deloitte runs a Self-Managed instance on their own infrastructure. "Release Parity" = getting the same features on both versions at the same time. Kush keeps asking because Deloitte's instance has been behind.
Ask: "You keep getting this question from me" - Kush
Now: May 27 release closes the gap with 15+ features shipping to Self-Managed: Chatbot APIs, Version Control, Pinned Credentials, ServiceNow integration, MITRE ATT&CK framework, Member API Keys. Biggest parity close yet.
Ask: 3-layer compound learning (user → agent → org). "In Kindo, I did not see any of this stuff today."
Now: Not in May 27. Requires platform architecture. Risk: degrades compound learning in HP shadow.
Ask: Supervisory triage agent calls Detection Engineering + Cyber Threat Intelligence sub-agents automatically.
Now: Agent-to-Agent feature flag enabled on Deloitte's Self-Managed Kindo instance (calibrated rollout). General Availability gated on resource hardening.
Shipping May 27: ServiceNow triggers, MITRE ATT&CK, Dynamic API resolution
In review: SailPoint writes, PostgreSQL, Jira attachments
Urgent: Zscaler ZIA for May 27 demo; Swimlane fix (TEK-141)
Done: Long-run reliability + Plan Mode, Agent Version Control (GitOps), Pinned Credentials, Error UX, Chat Actions API, Chatbot APIs
Backlog: Error messages (8798), re-run failed step (10190), resizable windows (9378), prompt filtering (9967)
"$25K/month, 80% LLM" - Nathan. Four strategies planned: auto model selection, better context, structured memory, compaction. Not in May 27.
Now: "Hold back on Canvas. We'll use TrueArch Hub." - Kush. Chat Actions API (shipping May 27) powers it.
But: Kush calls Canvas/UX "uber uber important" for the long-term vision - making Kindo the "everyday workbench for the entire security organization." Deprioritized for Phase 1-2; strategic priority for Phase 3-4 CISO-level engagement.
R Responsible A Accountable C Consulted I Informed
| Activity | Krishna | Nathan | Kindo | Joana | Tony |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ph 1 - Installation & Doc Ingestion | |||||
| SMK provisioning (AEF) | A | R | R | C | I |
| Security & NEC review | A | R | C | I | I |
| D&RaaS agent deployment (A.1-A.5) | C | A | R | C | I |
| HP integrations (private MCP) | C | A | C | I | I |
| ITSM + SOP ingestion | A | I | C | R | I |
| Ph 2 - Shadow (Parallel Operation) | |||||
| Ticket mirroring + monitoring | C | A | R | R | I |
| Human feedback + accuracy tracking | C | I | C | A | I |
| Weekly review | A | C | I | R | C |
| Ph 3 - Reverse Shadow (Agent-Primary) | |||||
| Agent primary + 15% human oversight | A | C | R | A | I |
| Validation + EBITDA tracking | C | I | I | R | A |
| Go/no-go steady state | R | C | C | C | I |
| Ph 4 - Steady State (Production) | |||||
| Autonomous execution (70%) + 100% audit | A | I | R | C | I |
| EBITDA reporting + custom expansion | C | C | R | A | A |
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Platform stability | Blocks Ph 1 | Sandbox hardening; Nathan cleanup. Deloitte will NOT deploy internally first - clients before internal. |
| Agent memory gap | Degrades learning | Manual IK during Shadow |
| OGC legal (per client) | Serial bottleneck on migration + 100-install target | Map OGC approval pipeline; track cleared vs pending |
| 48-hour RCA obligation | Support burden on outages | Factor into support planning; QBR escalation path |
| Swimlane = two workstreams | May 31 = AI use only; SOAR replacement = separate, harder | Split tracking: AI use (May 31) vs SOAR/workflow (longer) |
| Jira migration = 3 mo/client | Constrains cost elimination | Build client-by-client windows; start early |
| Release parity | Limits visibility | May 27 release closes gap |
| AEF env decision | Delays provisioning | HP = prod = AEF |
Parallel track: Chitra (Kush's team) runs internal enablement for 2,800+ people independently. Deloitte owns breadth; Kindo owns depth.
42-item scope: agents, platform, delivery, service lines, operations - with status, IK dependency, focal person.
Leadership, ops, service lines, agents, and Kindo integration points across Cyber Operate.